KLMSN vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KLMSN and KENT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KLMSN | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 21.86 | 292.50 | 20.66 |
| Daily change | −4.04% | 0.86% | −4.12% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.7B | TRY 96.5B | TRY 3.8B |
| P/B | 0.43 | 12.48 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | — | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | −10.02% | −13.03% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 32.55% | 0.54% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KLMSN vs KENT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KLMSN (Klimasan Klima) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:41. Of the 15 metrics compared, KLMSN leads in 8 and KENT leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −4.04%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 1.7B). P/B: KLMSN leads (0.43 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: KLMSN leads (11.77 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: KLMSN leads (1.17 vs 11.82). Gross margin: KLMSN leads (17.35% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): KLMSN leads (9.30% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): KLMSN leads (−5.63% vs −6.14%).
Frequently asked questions
Is KLMSN or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, KLMSN trades at the lower multiple (0.43 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, KLMSN or KENT?
Annual net margin is −5.63% for KLMSN and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is −10.02% for KLMSN and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, KLMSN or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 63.25 for KLMSN and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is 5.04 for KLMSN and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.