KLMSN vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KLMSN and FROTO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KLMSN | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 21.92 | 75.20 | 20.69 |
| Daily change | −3.78% | −2.08% | −3.92% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.7B | TRY 263.9B | TRY 3.8B |
| P/E | — | 8.12 | 16.24 |
| P/B | 0.43 | 1.50 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 3.36% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | −10.02% | 19.65% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 32.55% | 17.66% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KLMSN vs FROTO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KLMSN (Klimasan Klima) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:21. Of the 16 metrics compared, KLMSN leads in 4 and FROTO leads in 12.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.08% vs −3.78%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 263.9B vs TRY 1.7B). P/B: KLMSN leads (0.43 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 11.77). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 1.17). Dividend yield: FROTO leads (3.36% vs 0.44%). Gross margin: KLMSN leads (17.35% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): KLMSN leads (9.30% vs 6.30%).
Frequently asked questions
Is KLMSN or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 8.12); by P/B, KLMSN trades at the lower multiple (0.43 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, KLMSN or FROTO?
Annual net margin is −5.63% for KLMSN and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is −10.02% for KLMSN and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, KLMSN or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 63.25 for KLMSN and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is 5.04 for KLMSN and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.