KENT vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and FROTO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KENT | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 292.50 | 75.50 | 10.95 |
| Daily change | 0.86% | −1.69% | −3.97% |
| Market cap | TRY 96.5B | TRY 264.9B | TRY 4.5B |
| P/E | — | 8.12 | 13.61 |
| P/B | 12.48 | 1.50 | 0.89 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% | 1.23% |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | 19.65% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 17.66% | 32.02% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KENT vs FROTO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 15 metrics compared, KENT leads in 6 and FROTO leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −1.69%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 264.9B vs TRY 96.5B). P/B: FROTO leads (1.50 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 11.82). Gross margin: KENT leads (14.39% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): FROTO leads (6.30% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): FROTO leads (4.28% vs −6.14%).
Frequently asked questions
Is KENT or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 8.12); by P/B, FROTO trades at the lower multiple (12.48 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, KENT or FROTO?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.