IMASM vs TTRAK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of IMASM and TTRAK side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | IMASM | TTRAK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.56 | 399.50 | 20.65 |
| Daily change | −3.70% | −1.84% | −4.04% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.4B | TRY 40B | TRY 3.8B |
| P/B | 0.43 | 2.15 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.12% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | −14.10% | −5.13% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 70.18% | 24.94% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the IMASM vs TTRAK comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of IMASM (Imas Makina) and TTRAK (Türk Traktor) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:40. Of the 15 metrics compared, IMASM leads in 10 and TTRAK leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: TTRAK leads (−1.84% vs −3.70%). Market cap: TTRAK leads (TRY 40B vs TRY 1.4B). P/B: IMASM leads (0.43 vs 2.15). EV/EBITDA: IMASM leads (12.89 vs 19.57). EV/Sales: IMASM leads (1.67 vs 2.10). Gross margin: IMASM leads (39.29% vs 7.91%). EBITDA margin (annual): IMASM leads (12.61% vs 8.53%). Net margin (annual): TTRAK leads (−2.11% vs −17.40%).
Frequently asked questions
Is IMASM or TTRAK cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, IMASM trades at the lower multiple (0.43 vs 2.15).
Which is more profitable, IMASM or TTRAK?
Annual net margin is −17.40% for IMASM and −2.11% for TTRAK; return on equity is −14.10% for IMASM and −5.13% for TTRAK.
Which is more leveraged, IMASM or TTRAK?
The leverage ratio is 44.90 for IMASM and 55.16 for TTRAK; net debt/EBITDA is 1.83 for IMASM and 2.43 for TTRAK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.