FROTO vs IMASM Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and IMASM side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FROTO | IMASM | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 75.15 | 1.55 | 20.61 |
| Daily change | −2.15% | −4.32% | −4.51% |
| Market cap | TRY 263.7B | TRY 1.4B | TRY 3.8B |
| P/E | 8.12 | — | 16.24 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 0.43 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | — | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | −14.10% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 70.18% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FROTO vs IMASM comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and IMASM (Imas Makina) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:17. Of the 15 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 9 and IMASM leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.15% vs −4.32%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 263.7B vs TRY 1.4B). P/B: IMASM leads (0.43 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 12.89). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 1.67). Gross margin: IMASM leads (39.29% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): IMASM leads (12.61% vs 6.30%). Net margin (annual): FROTO leads (4.28% vs −17.40%).
Frequently asked questions
Is FROTO or IMASM cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (8.12 vs —); by P/B, IMASM trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 0.43).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or IMASM?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and −17.40% for IMASM; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and −14.10% for IMASM.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or IMASM?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 44.90 for IMASM; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and 1.83 for IMASM. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.