IMASM vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of IMASM and GUBRF side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | IMASM | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.56 | 438.50 | 20.65 |
| Daily change | −3.70% | −4.26% | −4.04% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.4B | TRY 146.5B | TRY 3.8B |
| P/E | — | 19.22 | 16.24 |
| P/B | 0.43 | 3.89 | 1.17 |
| Return on equity | −14.10% | 23.87% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 70.18% | 20.28% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the IMASM vs GUBRF comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of IMASM (Imas Makina) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:40. Of the 15 metrics compared, IMASM leads in 5 and GUBRF leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: IMASM leads (−3.70% vs −4.26%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 146.5B vs TRY 1.4B). P/B: IMASM leads (0.43 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: GUBRF leads (11.70 vs 12.89). EV/Sales: IMASM leads (1.67 vs 3.90). Gross margin: IMASM leads (39.29% vs 26.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): GUBRF leads (22.84% vs 12.61%). Net margin (annual): GUBRF leads (13.44% vs −17.40%).
Frequently asked questions
Is IMASM or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 19.22); by P/B, IMASM trades at the lower multiple (0.43 vs 3.89).
Which is more profitable, IMASM or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is −17.40% for IMASM and 13.44% for GUBRF; return on equity is −14.10% for IMASM and 23.87% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, IMASM or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 44.90 for IMASM and 41.50 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is 1.83 for IMASM and −0.39 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.