IMASM vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of IMASM and FROTO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | IMASM | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.56 | 75.55 | 20.54 |
| Daily change | −3.70% | −1.63% | −4.48% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.4B | TRY 265.1B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | — | 8.12 | 16.24 |
| P/B | 0.43 | 1.50 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | −14.10% | 19.65% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 70.18% | 17.66% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the IMASM vs FROTO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of IMASM (Imas Makina) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:05. Of the 15 metrics compared, IMASM leads in 6 and FROTO leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−1.63% vs −3.70%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 265.1B vs TRY 1.4B). P/B: IMASM leads (0.43 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 12.89). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 1.67). Gross margin: IMASM leads (39.29% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): IMASM leads (12.61% vs 6.30%). Net margin (annual): FROTO leads (4.28% vs −17.40%).
Frequently asked questions
Is IMASM or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 8.12); by P/B, IMASM trades at the lower multiple (0.43 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, IMASM or FROTO?
Annual net margin is −17.40% for IMASM and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is −14.10% for IMASM and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, IMASM or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 44.90 for IMASM and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is 1.83 for IMASM and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.