GUBRF vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GUBRF and FROTO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GUBRF | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 437.50 | 74.75 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −4.48% | −2.67% | −5.92% |
| Market cap | TRY 146.1B | TRY 262.3B | TRY 4.3B |
| P/E | 19.22 | 8.12 | 17.25 |
| P/B | 3.89 | 1.50 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% | 0.90% |
| Return on equity | 23.87% | 19.65% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 20.28% | 17.66% | 37.21% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GUBRF vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:56. Of the 16 metrics compared, GUBRF leads in 10 and FROTO leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.67% vs −4.48%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 262.3B vs TRY 146.1B). P/E: FROTO leads (8.12 vs 19.22). P/B: FROTO leads (1.50 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 11.70). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 3.90). Gross margin: GUBRF leads (26.69% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): GUBRF leads (22.84% vs 6.30%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GUBRF or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, FROTO is cheaper (19.22 vs 8.12); by P/B, FROTO trades at the lower multiple (3.89 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, GUBRF or FROTO?
Annual net margin is 13.44% for GUBRF and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is 23.87% for GUBRF and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, GUBRF or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 41.50 for GUBRF and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is −0.39 for GUBRF and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.