IMASM vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of IMASM and GLRYH side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IMASM | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.51 | 1.74 | 20.15 |
| Daily change | −6.79% | −4.40% | −5.96% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.4B | TRY 1B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | — | 2.32 | 15.47 |
| P/B | 0.43 | 0.19 | 1.09 |
| Return on equity | −14.10% | 9.45% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 70.18% | 79.42% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IMASM vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of IMASM (Imas Makina) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:47. Of the 14 metrics compared, IMASM leads in 4 and GLRYH leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−4.40% vs −6.79%). Market cap: IMASM leads (TRY 1.4B vs TRY 1B). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 0.43). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 12.89). EV/Sales: IMASM leads (1.67 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 39.29%). EBITDA margin (annual): IMASM leads (12.61% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −17.40%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is IMASM or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.43 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, IMASM or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is −17.40% for IMASM and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is −14.10% for IMASM and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, IMASM or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 44.90 for IMASM and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is 1.83 for IMASM and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.