GLRYH vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRYH and FROTO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GLRYH | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.77 | 75.35 | 7.47 |
| Daily change | −2.75% | −1.89% | −3.52% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.1B | TRY 264.4B | TRY 574.5M |
| P/E | 2.32 | 8.12 | 9.24 |
| P/B | 0.19 | 1.50 | 0.73 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% | 0.92% |
| Return on equity | 9.45% | 19.65% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 79.42% | 17.66% | 79.42% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GLRYH vs FROTO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:53. Of the 15 metrics compared, GLRYH leads in 9 and FROTO leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−1.89% vs −2.75%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 264.4B vs TRY 1.1B). P/E: GLRYH leads (2.32 vs 8.12). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 9.18). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): FROTO leads (6.30% vs −42.31%).
Frequently asked questions
Is GLRYH or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, GLRYH is cheaper (2.32 vs 8.12); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.19 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, GLRYH or FROTO?
Annual net margin is 41.94% for GLRYH and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is 9.45% for GLRYH and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, GLRYH or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 37.89 for GLRYH and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is — for GLRYH and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.