GLRMK vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRMK and TUPRS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GLRMK | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 141.10 | 399.75 | 15.77 |
| Daily change | −3.88% | −1.54% | −4.52% |
| Market cap | TRY 45.5B | TRY 770.2B | TRY 5.6B |
| P/E | 12.19 | 10.75 | 27.37 |
| P/B | 1.67 | 1.72 | 1.07 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.00% | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 17.35% | 18.20% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 25.53% | 49.42% | 26.74% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GLRMK vs TUPRS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRMK (Gulermak Agir Sanayi) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:21. Of the 16 metrics compared, GLRMK leads in 6 and TUPRS leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−1.54% vs −3.88%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 770.2B vs TRY 45.5B). P/E: TUPRS leads (10.75 vs 12.19). P/B: GLRMK leads (1.67 vs 1.72). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (6.43 vs 8.02). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 2.14). Gross margin: GLRMK leads (13.29% vs 12.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): GLRMK leads (12.63% vs 10.32%).
Frequently asked questions
Is GLRMK or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, TUPRS is cheaper (12.19 vs 10.75); by P/B, GLRMK trades at the lower multiple (1.67 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, GLRMK or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is 8.37% for GLRMK and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is 17.35% for GLRMK and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, GLRMK or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 64.52 for GLRMK and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is −0.07 for GLRMK and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.