TUPRS vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of TUPRS and CIMSA side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | TUPRS | CIMSA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 397.25 | 42.88 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −2.16% | 0.19% | −5.33% |
| Market cap | TRY 765.4B | TRY 40.5B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | 10.75 | 9.32 | 17.25 |
| P/B | 1.72 | 1.08 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 4.00% | 1.50% | 0.90% |
| Return on equity | 18.20% | 12.50% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 49.42% | 45.08% | 37.21% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the TUPRS vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of TUPRS (Tüpraş) and CIMSA (Cimsa) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 16:52. Of the 17 metrics compared, TUPRS leads in 11 and CIMSA leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (0.19% vs −2.16%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 765.4B vs TRY 40.5B). P/E: CIMSA leads (9.32 vs 10.75). P/B: CIMSA leads (1.08 vs 1.72). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (6.43 vs 8.12). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 2.62). Dividend yield: TUPRS leads (4.00% vs 1.50%). Gross margin: CIMSA leads (17.56% vs 12.69%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is TUPRS or CIMSA cheaper?
By P/E, CIMSA is cheaper (10.75 vs 9.32); by P/B, CIMSA trades at the lower multiple (1.72 vs 1.08).
Which is more profitable, TUPRS or CIMSA?
Annual net margin is 7.07% for TUPRS and 9.76% for CIMSA; return on equity is 18.20% for TUPRS and 12.50% for CIMSA.
Which is more leveraged, TUPRS or CIMSA?
The leverage ratio is 46.13 for TUPRS and 52.21 for CIMSA; net debt/EBITDA is −1.23 for TUPRS and 3.11 for CIMSA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.