GLRMK vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRMK and CIMSA side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GLRMK | CIMSA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 141.30 | 42.32 | 16.04 |
| Daily change | −3.75% | −1.12% | −4.50% |
| Market cap | TRY 45.6B | TRY 40B | TRY 5.6B |
| P/E | 12.19 | 9.32 | 27.37 |
| P/B | 1.67 | 1.08 | 1.07 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.50% | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 17.35% | 12.50% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 25.53% | 45.08% | 26.74% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GLRMK vs CIMSA comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRMK (Gulermak Agir Sanayi) and CIMSA (Cimsa) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:30. Of the 16 metrics compared, GLRMK leads in 9 and CIMSA leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−1.12% vs −3.75%). Market cap: GLRMK leads (TRY 45.6B vs TRY 40B). P/E: CIMSA leads (9.32 vs 12.19). P/B: CIMSA leads (1.08 vs 1.67). EV/EBITDA: GLRMK leads (8.02 vs 8.12). EV/Sales: GLRMK leads (2.14 vs 2.62). Gross margin: CIMSA leads (17.56% vs 13.29%). EBITDA margin (annual): CIMSA leads (18.96% vs 12.63%).
Frequently asked questions
Is GLRMK or CIMSA cheaper?
By P/E, CIMSA is cheaper (12.19 vs 9.32); by P/B, CIMSA trades at the lower multiple (1.67 vs 1.08).
Which is more profitable, GLRMK or CIMSA?
Annual net margin is 8.37% for GLRMK and 9.76% for CIMSA; return on equity is 17.35% for GLRMK and 12.50% for CIMSA.
Which is more leveraged, GLRMK or CIMSA?
The leverage ratio is 64.52 for GLRMK and 52.21 for CIMSA; net debt/EBITDA is −0.07 for GLRMK and 3.11 for CIMSA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.