GLRMK vs KARTN Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRMK and KARTN side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GLRMK | KARTN | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 141.20 | 91.75 | 15.75 |
| Daily change | −3.81% | −9.96% | −4.41% |
| Market cap | TRY 45.6B | TRY 6.9B | TRY 5.6B |
| P/E | 12.19 | — | 27.37 |
| P/B | 1.67 | 2.62 | 1.07 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.52% | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 17.35% | −20.89% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 25.53% | 40.99% | 26.74% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GLRMK vs KARTN comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRMK (Gulermak Agir Sanayi) and KARTN (Kartonsan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:23. Of the 14 metrics compared, GLRMK leads in 12 and KARTN leads in 2.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRMK leads (−3.81% vs −9.96%). Market cap: GLRMK leads (TRY 45.6B vs TRY 6.9B). P/B: GLRMK leads (1.67 vs 2.62). EV/EBITDA: GLRMK leads (8.02 vs −11.42). EV/Sales: GLRMK leads (2.14 vs 3.87). Gross margin: GLRMK leads (13.29% vs −15.81%). EBITDA margin (annual): GLRMK leads (12.63% vs −17.87%). Net margin (annual): GLRMK leads (8.37% vs −16.67%).
Frequently asked questions
Is GLRMK or KARTN cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (12.19 vs —); by P/B, GLRMK trades at the lower multiple (1.67 vs 2.62).
Which is more profitable, GLRMK or KARTN?
Annual net margin is 8.37% for GLRMK and −16.67% for KARTN; return on equity is 17.35% for GLRMK and −20.89% for KARTN.
Which is more leveraged, GLRMK or KARTN?
The leverage ratio is 64.52 for GLRMK and 33.91 for KARTN; net debt/EBITDA is −0.07 for GLRMK and — for KARTN. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.