KARTN vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KARTN and CIMSA side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KARTN | CIMSA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 91.75 | 42.04 | 16.60 |
| Daily change | −9.96% | −1.78% | −5.31% |
| Market cap | TRY 6.9B | TRY 39.8B | TRY 2.7B |
| P/E | — | 9.32 | 6.74 |
| P/B | 2.62 | 1.08 | 1.24 |
| Dividend yield | 2.52% | 1.50% | 2.52% |
| Return on equity | −20.89% | 12.50% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 40.99% | 45.08% | 34.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KARTN vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KARTN (Kartonsan) and CIMSA (Cimsa) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:18. Of the 15 metrics compared, KARTN leads in 5 and CIMSA leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−1.78% vs −9.96%). Market cap: CIMSA leads (TRY 39.8B vs TRY 6.9B). P/B: CIMSA leads (1.08 vs 2.62). EV/EBITDA: CIMSA leads (8.12 vs −11.42). EV/Sales: CIMSA leads (2.62 vs 3.87). Dividend yield: KARTN leads (2.52% vs 1.50%). Gross margin: CIMSA leads (17.56% vs −15.81%). EBITDA margin (annual): CIMSA leads (18.96% vs −17.87%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KARTN or CIMSA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 9.32); by P/B, CIMSA trades at the lower multiple (2.62 vs 1.08).
Which is more profitable, KARTN or CIMSA?
Annual net margin is −16.67% for KARTN and 9.76% for CIMSA; return on equity is −20.89% for KARTN and 12.50% for CIMSA.
Which is more leveraged, KARTN or CIMSA?
The leverage ratio is 33.91 for KARTN and 52.21 for CIMSA; net debt/EBITDA is — for KARTN and 3.11 for CIMSA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.