GARFA vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GARFA and KENT side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GARFA | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 22.46 | 281.00 | 10.46 |
| Daily change | −5.55% | −3.10% | −4.76% |
| Market cap | TRY 8.9B | TRY 92.7B | TRY 7.8B |
| P/E | 3.60 | — | 3.44 |
| P/B | 1.40 | 12.48 | 0.90 |
| Return on equity | 45.56% | −13.03% | 33.74% |
| Free float | 8.37% | 0.54% | 31.44% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GARFA vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GARFA (Garanti Faktoring) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:17. Of the 6 metrics compared, GARFA leads in 4 and KENT leads in 2.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (−3.10% vs −5.55%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 92.7B vs TRY 8.9B). P/B: GARFA leads (1.40 vs 12.48). Net margin (annual): GARFA leads (18.74% vs −6.14%). Return on assets: GARFA leads (7.06% vs −7.29%). Return on equity: GARFA leads (45.56% vs −13.03%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GARFA or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (3.60 vs —); by P/B, GARFA trades at the lower multiple (1.40 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, GARFA or KENT?
Annual net margin is 18.74% for GARFA and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is 45.56% for GARFA and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, GARFA or KENT?
The leverage ratio is — for GARFA and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is — for GARFA and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.