GARFA vs QNBFK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GARFA and QNBFK side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GARFA | QNBFK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 22.80 | 36.78 | 10.51 |
| Daily change | −4.12% | 0.49% | −3.99% |
| Market cap | TRY 9.1B | TRY 91.9B | TRY 7.8B |
| P/E | 3.60 | 43.08 | 3.60 |
| P/B | 1.40 | 11.22 | 0.95 |
| Return on equity | 45.56% | 30.06% | 33.74% |
| Free float | 8.37% | 0.60% | 31.44% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GARFA vs QNBFK comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GARFA (Garanti Faktoring) and QNBFK (Qnb Finansal Kiralama) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:05. Of the 7 metrics compared, GARFA leads in 4 and QNBFK leads in 3.
Highlights: Daily change: QNBFK leads (0.49% vs −4.12%). Market cap: QNBFK leads (TRY 91.9B vs TRY 9.1B). P/E: GARFA leads (3.60 vs 43.08). P/B: GARFA leads (1.40 vs 11.22). Net margin (annual): QNBFK leads (189.09% vs 18.74%). Return on assets: GARFA leads (7.06% vs 3.77%). Return on equity: GARFA leads (45.56% vs 30.06%).
Frequently asked questions
Is GARFA or QNBFK cheaper?
By P/E, GARFA is cheaper (3.60 vs 43.08); by P/B, GARFA trades at the lower multiple (1.40 vs 11.22).
Which is more profitable, GARFA or QNBFK?
Annual net margin is 18.74% for GARFA and 189.09% for QNBFK; return on equity is 45.56% for GARFA and 30.06% for QNBFK.
Which is more leveraged, GARFA or QNBFK?
The leverage ratio is — for GARFA and — for QNBFK; net debt/EBITDA is — for GARFA and — for QNBFK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.