KENT vs QNBFK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and QNBFK side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KENT | QNBFK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 289.00 | 35.64 | 10.86 |
| Daily change | −0.34% | −2.62% | −5.00% |
| Market cap | TRY 95.4B | TRY 89.1B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 43.08 | 13.64 |
| P/B | 12.48 | 11.22 | 0.86 |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | 30.06% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 0.60% | 32.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KENT vs QNBFK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and QNBFK (Qnb Finansal Kiralama) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:00. Of the 6 metrics compared, KENT leads in 2 and QNBFK leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (−0.34% vs −2.62%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 95.4B vs TRY 89.1B). P/B: QNBFK leads (11.22 vs 12.48). Net margin (annual): QNBFK leads (189.09% vs −6.14%). Return on assets: QNBFK leads (3.77% vs −7.29%). Return on equity: QNBFK leads (30.06% vs −13.03%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KENT or QNBFK cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 43.08); by P/B, QNBFK trades at the lower multiple (12.48 vs 11.22).
Which is more profitable, KENT or QNBFK?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and 189.09% for QNBFK; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and 30.06% for QNBFK.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or QNBFK?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and — for QNBFK; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and — for QNBFK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.