Yatırımcı.AI

TJT vs UP2 Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of TJT (TEB Portföy Altıncı Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and UP2 (Ünlü Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.

TJTUP2
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

TJT vs UP2 Fund Comparison
MetricTJTUP2Category median
Daily−0.01%0.10%0.01%
1 week0.43%0.68%0.30%
1 month0.14%2.97%0.00%
3 months4.03%9.88%3.96%
6 months7.13%21.41%8.18%
YTD12.52%36.19%15.73%
1 year18.87%46.43%20.69%
3 years125.37%260.00%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the TJT vs UP2 Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of TJT (TEB Portföy Altıncı Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and UP2 (Ünlü Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, TJT leads in 1 and UP2 leads in 9. TJT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UP2 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: UP2 leads (0.10% vs −0.01%). 1 week: UP2 leads (0.68% vs 0.43%). 1 month: UP2 leads (2.97% vs 0.14%). 3 months: UP2 leads (9.88% vs 4.03%). 6 months: UP2 leads (21.41% vs 7.13%). YTD: UP2 leads (36.19% vs 12.52%). 1 year: UP2 leads (46.43% vs 18.87%). 3 years: UP2 leads (260.00% vs 125.37%). Size (TRY): UP2 leads (2.2B vs 2B). Investors: TJT leads (1,656 vs 255).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date TJT returned 12.52% and UP2 returned 36.19%; over the last year TJT returned 18.87% and UP2 returned 46.43%. Over the last month TJT returned 0.14% and UP2 returned 2.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, TJT has a size of TRY 2B with 1,656 investors, while UP2 has a size of TRY 2.2B with 255 investors. UP2 leads in size and TJT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of TJT is — out of 7 and that of UP2 is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.