Yatırımcı.AI

RPL vs YSO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RPL (Re-Pie Portföy Algoritmik Stratejiler Serbest Fon) and YSO (Yapı Kredi Portföy Sağlık Sektörü Serbest Fon) side by side.

RPLYSO
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

RPL vs YSO Fund Comparison
MetricRPLYSOCategory median
Daily0.11%0.68%0.07%
1 week0.87%0.28%0.51%
1 month0.35%7.01%1.66%
3 months−13.27%6.84%3.04%
6 months−3.94%29.64%8.17%
YTD7.65%36.44%17.49%
1 year12.33%43.71%21.23%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the RPL vs YSO Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of RPL (Re-Pie Portföy Algoritmik Stratejiler Serbest Fon) and YSO (Yapı Kredi Portföy Sağlık Sektörü Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, RPL leads in 2 and YSO leads in 8. RPL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Re-Pie Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YSO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YSO leads (0.68% vs 0.11%). 1 week: RPL leads (0.87% vs 0.28%). 1 month: YSO leads (7.01% vs 0.35%). 3 months: YSO leads (6.84% vs −13.27%). 6 months: YSO leads (29.64% vs −3.94%). YTD: YSO leads (36.44% vs 7.65%). 1 year: YSO leads (43.71% vs 12.33%). Size (TRY): RPL leads (85.3M vs 79.7M). Investors: YSO leads (337 vs 6). Risk: YSO leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date RPL returned 7.65% and YSO returned 36.44%; over the last year RPL returned 12.33% and YSO returned 43.71%. Over the last month RPL returned 0.35% and YSO returned 7.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, RPL has a size of TRY 85.3M with 6 investors, while YSO has a size of TRY 79.7M with 337 investors. RPL leads in size and YSO leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of RPL is 7 out of 7 and that of YSO is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.