Yatırımcı.AI

RIK vs TND Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RIK (Re-Pie Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and TND (İş Portföy TTF Tenise Destek Değişken Fon) side by side.

RIKTND
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

RIK vs TND Fund Comparison
MetricRIKTNDCategory median
Daily0.34%0.10%0.21%
1 week−10.63%0.67%1.17%
1 month−11.33%2.93%−0.49%
3 months−23.63%9.31%−0.87%
6 months−26.18%20.33%0.68%
YTD−11.54%37.50%22.53%
1 year−5.69%44.23%29.33%
3 years137.30%—156.25%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the RIK vs TND Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of RIK (Re-Pie Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and TND (İş Portföy TTF Tenise Destek Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, RIK leads in 2 and TND leads in 8. RIK is a Variable Fund fund managed by Re-Pie Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TND is a Variable Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RIK leads (0.34% vs 0.10%). 1 week: TND leads (0.67% vs −10.63%). 1 month: TND leads (2.93% vs −11.33%). 3 months: TND leads (9.31% vs −23.63%). 6 months: TND leads (20.33% vs −26.18%). YTD: TND leads (37.50% vs −11.54%). 1 year: TND leads (44.23% vs −5.69%). Size (TRY): TND leads (185M vs 181.6M). Investors: RIK leads (1,995 vs 528). Risk: TND leads (2 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date RIK returned −11.54% and TND returned 37.50%; over the last year RIK returned −5.69% and TND returned 44.23%. Over the last month RIK returned −11.33% and TND returned 2.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, RIK has a size of TRY 181.6M with 1,995 investors, while TND has a size of TRY 185M with 528 investors. TND leads in size and RIK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of RIK is 4 out of 7 and that of TND is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.