Yatırımcı.AI

AFJ vs TND Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFJ (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TND (İş Portföy Ttf Tenise Destek Değişken Fon) side by side.

AFJTND
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AFJ vs TND Fund Comparison
MetricAFJTNDCategory median
Daily0.29%0.30%0.32%
1 week0.66%0.69%0.42%
1 month1.62%3.04%−1.48%
3 months7.65%9.66%4.48%
6 months19.35%20.97%14.82%
YTD29.35%31.38%25.33%
1 year42.76%44.89%35.72%
3 years236.47%—161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AFJ vs TND Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AFJ (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TND (İş Portföy Ttf Tenise Destek Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, AFJ leads in 1 and TND leads in 8. AFJ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; TND is a Variable Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TND leads (0.30% vs 0.29%). 1 week: TND leads (0.69% vs 0.66%). 1 month: TND leads (3.04% vs 1.62%). 3 months: TND leads (9.66% vs 7.65%). 6 months: TND leads (20.97% vs 19.35%). YTD: TND leads (31.38% vs 29.35%). 1 year: TND leads (44.89% vs 42.76%). Size (TRY): TND leads (182.9M vs 176.4M). Investors: AFJ leads (3,001 vs 497).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AFJ returned 29.35% and TND returned 31.38%; over the last year AFJ returned 42.76% and TND returned 44.89%. Over the last month AFJ returned 1.62% and TND returned 3.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AFJ has a size of TRY 176.4M with 3,001 investors, while TND has a size of TRY 182.9M with 497 investors. TND leads in size and AFJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AFJ is 2 out of 7 and that of TND is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.