Yatırımcı.AI

RIK vs SGT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RIK (Re-Pie Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

RIKSGT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

RIK vs SGT Fund Comparison
MetricRIKSGTCategory median
Daily−0.97%0.32%−1.35%
1 week−0.28%−0.20%−2.09%
1 month−9.46%−0.93%−4.70%
3 months−18.34%10.79%−1.44%
6 months−12.90%39.16%2.69%
YTD−2.06%51.54%20.04%
1 year5.90%50.17%28.83%
3 years169.29%—156.52%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the RIK vs SGT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of RIK (Re-Pie Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and SGT (Garanti Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, RIK leads in 1 and SGT leads in 9. RIK is a Variable Fund fund managed by Re-Pie Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SGT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: SGT leads (0.32% vs −0.97%). 1 week: SGT leads (−0.20% vs −0.28%). 1 month: SGT leads (−0.93% vs −9.46%). 3 months: SGT leads (10.79% vs −18.34%). 6 months: SGT leads (39.16% vs −12.90%). YTD: SGT leads (51.54% vs −2.06%). 1 year: SGT leads (50.17% vs 5.90%). Size (TRY): SGT leads (288.6M vs 215.8M). Investors: SGT leads (3,275 vs 2,118). Risk: RIK leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date RIK returned −2.06% and SGT returned 51.54%; over the last year RIK returned 5.90% and SGT returned 50.17%. Over the last month RIK returned −9.46% and SGT returned −0.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, RIK has a size of TRY 215.8M with 2,118 investors, while SGT has a size of TRY 288.6M with 3,275 investors. SGT leads in size and SGT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of RIK is 4 out of 7 and that of SGT is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.