PPV vs ZMT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | PPV | ZMT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.30% | 0.10% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.69% | −0.40% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 3.16% | −1.03% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 10.05% | 5.21% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 0.00% | 11.38% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 19.52% | 13.52% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | — | 19.50% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 120.95% | 111.64% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the PPV vs ZMT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZMT (Azimut Portföy 22.0 Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, PPV leads in 5 and ZMT leads in 4. PPV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZMT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PPV leads (0.30% vs 0.10%). 1 week: PPV leads (0.69% vs −0.40%). 1 month: PPV leads (3.16% vs −1.03%). 3 months: PPV leads (10.05% vs 5.21%). 6 months: ZMT leads (11.38% vs 0.00%). YTD: PPV leads (19.52% vs 13.52%). Size (TRY): ZMT leads (1.7B vs 1.6B). Investors: ZMT leads (261 vs 195). Risk: ZMT leads (0 vs 2).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, PPV or ZMT?
Year to date PPV returned 19.52% and ZMT returned 13.52%; over the last year PPV returned — and ZMT returned 19.50%. Over the last month PPV returned 3.16% and ZMT returned −1.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PPV or ZMT?
As of September 28, 2026, PPV has a size of TRY 1.6B with 195 investors, while ZMT has a size of TRY 1.7B with 261 investors. ZMT leads in size and ZMT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PPV and ZMT mean?
The CMB risk score of PPV is 2 out of 7 and that of ZMT is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.