FDV vs PPV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FDV (Azimut Portföy Dmr Serbest Fon) and PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FDV | PPV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.28% | — | −1.74% |
| Daily | 0.59% | 0.30% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 2.78% | 0.69% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 0.50% | 3.16% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 9.39% | 10.05% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 23.57% | 0.00% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 44.75% | 19.52% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 59.36% | — | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 269.43% | — | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FDV vs PPV comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FDV (Azimut Portföy Dmr Serbest Fon) and PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FDV leads in 4 and PPV leads in 5. FDV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FDV leads (0.59% vs 0.30%). 1 week: FDV leads (2.78% vs 0.69%). 1 month: PPV leads (3.16% vs 0.50%). 3 months: PPV leads (10.05% vs 9.39%). 6 months: FDV leads (23.57% vs 0.00%). YTD: FDV leads (44.75% vs 19.52%). Size (TRY): PPV leads (1.6B vs 1.5B). Investors: PPV leads (195 vs 1). Risk: PPV leads (2 vs 4).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FDV or PPV?
Year to date FDV returned 44.75% and PPV returned 19.52%; over the last year FDV returned 59.36% and PPV returned —. Over the last month FDV returned 0.50% and PPV returned 3.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FDV or PPV?
As of September 28, 2026, FDV has a size of TRY 1.5B with 1 investors, while PPV has a size of TRY 1.6B with 195 investors. PPV leads in size and PPV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FDV and PPV mean?
The CMB risk score of FDV is 4 out of 7 and that of PPV is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.