Yatırımcı.AI

PPG vs RBA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PPG (Albaraka Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and RBA (Albaraka Portföy Bereket Vakfı Na Destek Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.

PPGRBA
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

PPG vs RBA Fund Comparison
MetricPPGRBACategory median
Daily0.28%0.57%0.29%
1 week0.66%−1.76%0.41%
1 month3.00%−4.69%0.20%
3 months9.55%8.87%8.83%
6 months20.85%0.32%16.56%
YTD31.30%7.36%27.81%
1 year44.62%26.47%39.52%
3 years—292.18%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the PPG vs RBA comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PPG (Albaraka Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and RBA (Albaraka Portföy Bereket Vakfı Na Destek Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PPG leads in 7 and RBA leads in 3. PPG is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Albaraka Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RBA is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Albaraka Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RBA leads (0.57% vs 0.28%). 1 week: PPG leads (0.66% vs −1.76%). 1 month: PPG leads (3.00% vs −4.69%). 3 months: PPG leads (9.55% vs 8.87%). 6 months: PPG leads (20.85% vs 0.32%). YTD: PPG leads (31.30% vs 7.36%). 1 year: PPG leads (44.62% vs 26.47%). Size (TRY): RBA leads (1.8B vs 1.7B). Investors: RBA leads (5,065 vs 1,627). Risk: PPG leads (1 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date PPG returned 31.30% and RBA returned 7.36%; over the last year PPG returned 44.62% and RBA returned 26.47%. Over the last month PPG returned 3.00% and RBA returned −4.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, PPG has a size of TRY 1.7B with 1,627 investors, while RBA has a size of TRY 1.8B with 5,065 investors. RBA leads in size and RBA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PPG is 1 out of 7 and that of RBA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.