Yatırımcı.AI

FFH vs PPG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFH (Qnb Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and PPG (Albaraka Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) side by side.

FFHPPG
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FFH vs PPG Fund Comparison
MetricFFHPPGCategory median
Daily0.35%0.28%0.29%
1 week0.44%0.66%0.41%
1 month1.32%3.00%0.20%
3 months8.81%9.55%8.83%
6 months18.46%20.85%16.56%
YTD31.37%31.30%27.81%
1 year46.61%44.62%39.52%
3 years195.50%—172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FFH vs PPG comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FFH (Qnb Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and PPG (Albaraka Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FFH leads in 4 and PPG leads in 6. FFH is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPG is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Albaraka Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FFH leads (0.35% vs 0.28%). 1 week: PPG leads (0.66% vs 0.44%). 1 month: PPG leads (3.00% vs 1.32%). 3 months: PPG leads (9.55% vs 8.81%). 6 months: PPG leads (20.85% vs 18.46%). YTD: FFH leads (31.37% vs 31.30%). 1 year: FFH leads (46.61% vs 44.62%). Size (TRY): PPG leads (1.7B vs 1.7B). Investors: FFH leads (2,123 vs 1,627). Risk: PPG leads (1 vs 4).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FFH returned 31.37% and PPG returned 31.30%; over the last year FFH returned 46.61% and PPG returned 44.62%. Over the last month FFH returned 1.32% and PPG returned 3.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FFH has a size of TRY 1.7B with 2,123 investors, while PPG has a size of TRY 1.7B with 1,627 investors. PPG leads in size and FFH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FFH is 4 out of 7 and that of PPG is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.