Yatırımcı.AI

ONN vs ULH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ONN (Aktif Portföy Aktif Oniks Serbest (TL) Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) side by side.

ONNULH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ONN vs ULH Fund Comparison
MetricONNULHCategory median
Daily−0.08%0.15%−0.07%
1 week0.34%0.66%−0.29%
1 month2.46%4.15%0.00%
3 months9.24%8.61%4.33%
6 months19.87%21.92%11.90%
YTD30.97%20.63%14.97%
1 year44.75%28.85%21.27%
3 years249.36%232.27%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ONN vs ULH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ONN (Aktif Portföy Aktif Oniks Serbest (TL) Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ONN leads in 7 and ULH leads in 4. ONN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ULH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ULH leads (0.15% vs −0.08%). 1 week: ULH leads (0.66% vs 0.34%). 1 month: ULH leads (4.15% vs 2.46%). 3 months: ONN leads (9.24% vs 8.61%). 6 months: ULH leads (21.92% vs 19.87%). YTD: ONN leads (30.97% vs 20.63%). 1 year: ONN leads (44.75% vs 28.85%). 3 years: ONN leads (249.36% vs 232.27%). Size (TRY): ONN leads (1.3B vs 1.3B). Investors: ONN leads (527 vs 222). Risk: ONN leads (3 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ONN returned 30.97% and ULH returned 20.63%; over the last year ONN returned 44.75% and ULH returned 28.85%. Over the last month ONN returned 2.46% and ULH returned 4.15%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, ONN has a size of TRY 1.3B with 527 investors, while ULH has a size of TRY 1.3B with 222 investors. ONN leads in size and ONN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ONN is 3 out of 7 and that of ULH is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.