Yatırımcı.AI

OGD vs ZPF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of OGD (Oyak Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and ZPF (Ziraat Portföy Katılım Fonu (Döviz)) side by side.

OGDZPF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

OGD vs ZPF Fund Comparison
MetricOGDZPFCategory median
Daily−2.90%0.11%−0.26%
1 week−3.81%0.21%0.07%
1 month−7.61%1.63%0.00%
3 months6.73%5.81%7.62%
6 months0.17%13.00%16.55%
YTD5.19%16.21%28.23%
1 year24.54%23.03%39.45%
3 years260.87%125.53%164.81%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the OGD vs ZPF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of OGD (Oyak Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and ZPF (Ziraat Portföy Katılım Fonu (Döviz)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, OGD leads in 4 and ZPF leads in 6. OGD is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Oyak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZPF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZPF leads (0.11% vs −2.90%). 1 week: ZPF leads (0.21% vs −3.81%). 1 month: ZPF leads (1.63% vs −7.61%). 3 months: OGD leads (6.73% vs 5.81%). 6 months: ZPF leads (13.00% vs 0.17%). YTD: ZPF leads (16.21% vs 5.19%). 1 year: OGD leads (24.54% vs 23.03%). 3 years: OGD leads (260.87% vs 125.53%). Size (TRY): OGD leads (747.5M vs 744.7M). Investors: ZPF leads (3,368 vs 2,984).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date OGD returned 5.19% and ZPF returned 16.21%; over the last year OGD returned 24.54% and ZPF returned 23.03%. Over the last month OGD returned −7.61% and ZPF returned 1.63%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, OGD has a size of TRY 747.5M with 2,984 investors, while ZPF has a size of TRY 744.7M with 3,368 investors. OGD leads in size and ZPF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of OGD is 6 out of 7 and that of ZPF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.