Yatırımcı.AI

NUB vs ZVO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NUB (Nurol Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZVO (Ziraat Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

NUBZVO
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NUB vs ZVO Fund Comparison
MetricNUBZVOCategory median
Daily−0.43%1.09%0.07%
1 week−0.86%4.50%0.51%
1 month1.23%−10.23%1.66%
3 months1.99%−5.47%3.04%
6 months6.25%−5.56%8.17%
YTD13.35%−15.02%17.49%
1 year17.64%−9.87%21.23%
3 years—45.32%105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NUB vs ZVO Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NUB (Nurol Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZVO (Ziraat Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, NUB leads in 7 and ZVO leads in 2. NUB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZVO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZVO leads (1.09% vs −0.43%). 1 week: ZVO leads (4.50% vs −0.86%). 1 month: NUB leads (1.23% vs −10.23%). 3 months: NUB leads (1.99% vs −5.47%). 6 months: NUB leads (6.25% vs −5.56%). YTD: NUB leads (13.35% vs −15.02%). 1 year: NUB leads (17.64% vs −9.87%). Size (TRY): NUB leads (801.4M vs 772.9M). Investors: NUB leads (468 vs 268).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NUB returned 13.35% and ZVO returned −15.02%; over the last year NUB returned 17.64% and ZVO returned −9.87%. Over the last month NUB returned 1.23% and ZVO returned −10.23%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, NUB has a size of TRY 801.4M with 468 investors, while ZVO has a size of TRY 772.9M with 268 investors. NUB leads in size and NUB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NUB is — out of 7 and that of ZVO is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.