Yatırımcı.AI

NLK vs PUC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NLK (Nurol Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

NLKPUC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NLK vs PUC Fund Comparison
MetricNLKPUCCategory median
Daily0.10%0.10%−0.07%
1 week0.72%0.68%−0.29%
1 month3.35%3.25%0.00%
3 months10.44%10.19%4.33%
6 months22.14%21.69%11.90%
YTD34.48%33.35%14.97%
1 year49.08%47.27%21.27%
3 years—258.67%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NLK vs PUC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NLK (Nurol Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) and PUC (Ak Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NLK leads in 10 and PUC leads in 0. NLK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PUC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NLK leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: NLK leads (0.72% vs 0.68%). 1 month: NLK leads (3.35% vs 3.25%). 3 months: NLK leads (10.44% vs 10.19%). 6 months: NLK leads (22.14% vs 21.69%). YTD: NLK leads (34.48% vs 33.35%). 1 year: NLK leads (49.08% vs 47.27%). Size (TRY): NLK leads (6.1B vs 6.1B). Investors: NLK leads (831 vs 798). Risk: NLK leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NLK returned 34.48% and PUC returned 33.35%; over the last year NLK returned 49.08% and PUC returned 47.27%. Over the last month NLK returned 3.35% and PUC returned 3.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, NLK has a size of TRY 6.1B with 831 investors, while PUC has a size of TRY 6.1B with 798 investors. NLK leads in size and NLK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NLK is 1 out of 7 and that of PUC is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.