NHM vs VGC Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NHM (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VGC (Türkıye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | NHM | VGC | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.14% | −1.84% | −0.83% |
| 1 week | −0.48% | −2.92% | −0.98% |
| 1 month | 0.14% | −5.34% | −1.82% |
| 3 months | 5.99% | −2.77% | 3.78% |
| 6 months | 17.22% | 6.68% | 14.04% |
| YTD | 29.52% | 17.81% | 24.40% |
| 1 year | 39.56% | 27.99% | 34.17% |
| 3 years | 211.60% | 105.15% | 157.59% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the NHM vs VGC Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of NHM (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VGC (Türkıye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, NHM leads in 10 and VGC leads in 1. NHM is a Variable Fund fund managed by NN Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; VGC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NHM leads (0.14% vs −1.84%). 1 week: NHM leads (−0.48% vs −2.92%). 1 month: NHM leads (0.14% vs −5.34%). 3 months: NHM leads (5.99% vs −2.77%). 6 months: NHM leads (17.22% vs 6.68%). YTD: NHM leads (29.52% vs 17.81%). 1 year: NHM leads (39.56% vs 27.99%). 3 years: NHM leads (211.60% vs 105.15%). Size (TRY): NHM leads (670.4M vs 646.8M). Investors: VGC leads (10,232 vs 9,103). Risk: NHM leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, NHM or VGC?
Year to date NHM returned 29.52% and VGC returned 17.81%; over the last year NHM returned 39.56% and VGC returned 27.99%. Over the last month NHM returned 0.14% and VGC returned −5.34%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, NHM or VGC?
As of September 29, 2026, NHM has a size of TRY 670.4M with 9,103 investors, while VGC has a size of TRY 646.8M with 10,232 investors. NHM leads in size and VGC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of NHM and VGC mean?
The CMB risk score of NHM is 2 out of 7 and that of VGC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.