MTS vs SFS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MTS (Aktif Portföy Tarım ve Sürdürülebilirlik Fon Sepeti Fonu) and SFS (Azimut Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | MTS | SFS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.30% | 0.23% | −0.12% |
| 1 week | −0.19% | 1.30% | 0.58% |
| 1 month | −0.44% | −1.37% | −1.65% |
| 3 months | −1.98% | −1.79% | −1.67% |
| 6 months | −2.31% | 1.14% | 1.08% |
| YTD | 14.50% | 24.27% | 20.42% |
| 1 year | 15.84% | 29.51% | 26.40% |
| 3 years | 108.78% | — | 160.09% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the MTS vs SFS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MTS (Aktif Portföy Tarım ve Sürdürülebilirlik Fon Sepeti Fonu) and SFS (Azimut Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, MTS leads in 2 and SFS leads in 7. MTS is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SFS is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: SFS leads (0.23% vs −0.30%). 1 week: SFS leads (1.30% vs −0.19%). 1 month: MTS leads (−0.44% vs −1.37%). 3 months: SFS leads (−1.79% vs −1.98%). 6 months: SFS leads (1.14% vs −2.31%). YTD: SFS leads (24.27% vs 14.50%). 1 year: SFS leads (29.51% vs 15.84%). Size (TRY): SFS leads (29.4M vs 25.4M). Investors: MTS leads (527 vs 56).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, MTS or SFS?
Year to date MTS returned 14.50% and SFS returned 24.27%; over the last year MTS returned 15.84% and SFS returned 29.51%. Over the last month MTS returned −0.44% and SFS returned −1.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MTS or SFS?
As of November 13, 2026, MTS has a size of TRY 25.4M with 527 investors, while SFS has a size of TRY 29.4M with 56 investors. SFS leads in size and MTS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MTS and SFS mean?
The CMB risk score of MTS is 5 out of 7 and that of SFS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.