Yatırımcı.AI

GO3 vs MTS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GO3 (One Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) and MTS (Aktif Portföy Tarım ve Sürdürülebilirlik Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

GO3MTS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GO3 vs MTS Fund Comparison
MetricGO3MTSCategory median
Daily0.40%−0.28%0.39%
1 week−2.96%−1.37%0.25%
1 month−7.22%−1.45%−1.05%
3 months−0.29%1.31%6.44%
6 months7.07%7.97%13.81%
YTD16.37%16.81%22.40%
1 year26.76%23.76%35.81%
3 years178.15%110.15%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GO3 vs MTS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GO3 (One Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) and MTS (Aktif Portföy Tarım ve Sürdürülebilirlik Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GO3 leads in 3 and MTS leads in 7. GO3 is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MTS is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GO3 leads (0.40% vs −0.28%). 1 week: MTS leads (−1.37% vs −2.96%). 1 month: MTS leads (−1.45% vs −7.22%). 3 months: MTS leads (1.31% vs −0.29%). 6 months: MTS leads (7.97% vs 7.07%). YTD: MTS leads (16.81% vs 16.37%). 1 year: GO3 leads (26.76% vs 23.76%). 3 years: GO3 leads (178.15% vs 110.15%). Size (TRY): MTS leads (26.2M vs 24.5M). Investors: MTS leads (601 vs 384).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GO3 returned 16.37% and MTS returned 16.81%; over the last year GO3 returned 26.76% and MTS returned 23.76%. Over the last month GO3 returned −7.22% and MTS returned −1.45%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GO3 has a size of TRY 24.5M with 384 investors, while MTS has a size of TRY 26.2M with 601 investors. MTS leads in size and MTS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GO3 is 5 out of 7 and that of MTS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.