EYT vs SFS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EYT (Aktif Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and SFS (Azimut Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EYT | SFS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.40% | 0.23% | −0.12% |
| 1 week | 0.03% | 1.30% | 0.58% |
| 1 month | −1.00% | −1.37% | −1.65% |
| 3 months | −0.53% | −1.79% | −1.67% |
| 6 months | 4.06% | 1.14% | 1.08% |
| YTD | 24.87% | 24.27% | 20.42% |
| 1 year | 35.27% | 29.51% | 26.40% |
| 3 years | 188.73% | — | 160.09% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EYT vs SFS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EYT (Aktif Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and SFS (Azimut Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EYT leads in 8 and SFS leads in 2. EYT is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SFS is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: SFS leads (0.23% vs −0.40%). 1 week: SFS leads (1.30% vs 0.03%). 1 month: EYT leads (−1.00% vs −1.37%). 3 months: EYT leads (−0.53% vs −1.79%). 6 months: EYT leads (4.06% vs 1.14%). YTD: EYT leads (24.87% vs 24.27%). 1 year: EYT leads (35.27% vs 29.51%). Size (TRY): EYT leads (31.6M vs 29.4M). Investors: EYT leads (342 vs 56). Risk: EYT leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EYT or SFS?
Year to date EYT returned 24.87% and SFS returned 24.27%; over the last year EYT returned 35.27% and SFS returned 29.51%. Over the last month EYT returned −1.00% and SFS returned −1.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EYT or SFS?
As of November 13, 2026, EYT has a size of TRY 31.6M with 342 investors, while SFS has a size of TRY 29.4M with 56 investors. EYT leads in size and EYT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EYT and SFS mean?
The CMB risk score of EYT is 3 out of 7 and that of SFS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.