KVT vs UPH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KVT (Ak Portföy Enerji Şirketleri Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and UPH (Ünlü Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KVT | UPH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.82% | −1.24% | −1.34% |
| Daily | −3.35% | −1.36% | −1.77% |
| 1 week | −1.08% | −2.77% | −2.74% |
| 1 month | −15.92% | −3.82% | −7.45% |
| 3 months | −12.78% | −4.67% | −4.07% |
| 6 months | 0.44% | 7.83% | 6.56% |
| YTD | 7.43% | 17.62% | 18.36% |
| 1 year | 4.63% | 21.21% | 19.84% |
| 3 years | — | 84.87% | 91.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KVT vs UPH Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KVT (Ak Portföy Enerji Şirketleri Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and UPH (Ünlü Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KVT leads in 3 and UPH leads in 7. KVT is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UPH is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Today (est.): UPH leads (−1.24% vs −1.82%). Daily: UPH leads (−1.36% vs −3.35%). 1 week: KVT leads (−1.08% vs −2.77%). 1 month: UPH leads (−3.82% vs −15.92%). 3 months: UPH leads (−4.67% vs −12.78%). 6 months: UPH leads (7.83% vs 0.44%). YTD: UPH leads (17.62% vs 7.43%). 1 year: UPH leads (21.21% vs 4.63%). Size (TRY): KVT leads (94.4M vs 93.7M). Investors: KVT leads (2,707 vs 456).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, KVT or UPH?
Year to date KVT returned 7.43% and UPH returned 17.62%; over the last year KVT returned 4.63% and UPH returned 21.21%. Over the last month KVT returned −15.92% and UPH returned −3.82%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KVT or UPH?
As of September 29, 2026, KVT has a size of TRY 94.4M with 2,707 investors, while UPH has a size of TRY 93.7M with 456 investors. KVT leads in size and KVT leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KVT and UPH mean?
The CMB risk score of KVT is 6 out of 7 and that of UPH is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.