Yatırımcı.AI

KUB vs ZDD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KUB (Kare Portföy Değişken (Döviz) Fonu) and ZDD (Ziraat Portföy Temkinli Değişken Fon) side by side.

KUBZDD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KUB vs ZDD Fund Comparison
MetricKUBZDDCategory median
Daily−0.44%−0.21%−0.83%
1 week−0.65%−0.04%−0.98%
1 month0.50%0.70%−1.82%
3 months7.13%6.24%3.78%
6 months18.25%15.77%14.04%
YTD13.06%25.19%24.40%
1 year18.25%36.70%34.17%
3 years152.66%198.02%157.59%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KUB vs ZDD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KUB (Kare Portföy Değişken (Döviz) Fonu) and ZDD (Ziraat Portföy Temkinli Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, KUB leads in 4 and ZDD leads in 7. KUB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZDD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZDD leads (−0.21% vs −0.44%). 1 week: ZDD leads (−0.04% vs −0.65%). 1 month: ZDD leads (0.70% vs 0.50%). 3 months: KUB leads (7.13% vs 6.24%). 6 months: KUB leads (18.25% vs 15.77%). YTD: ZDD leads (25.19% vs 13.06%). 1 year: ZDD leads (36.70% vs 18.25%). 3 years: ZDD leads (198.02% vs 152.66%). Size (TRY): KUB leads (530.9M vs 520.5M). Investors: KUB leads (3,207 vs 1,430). Risk: ZDD leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KUB returned 13.06% and ZDD returned 25.19%; over the last year KUB returned 18.25% and ZDD returned 36.70%. Over the last month KUB returned 0.50% and ZDD returned 0.70%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, KUB has a size of TRY 530.9M with 3,207 investors, while ZDD has a size of TRY 520.5M with 1,430 investors. KUB leads in size and KUB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KUB is 6 out of 7 and that of ZDD is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.