KTS vs NKA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KTS (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and NKA (Neo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KTS | NKA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.64% | — | −1.16% |
| Daily | −2.99% | 0.06% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | −7.97% | 0.47% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | −11.44% | 1.86% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −10.22% | 5.74% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | −1.06% | 11.83% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 30.09% | 17.89% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 36.85% | 21.08% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | 126.92% | — | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KTS vs NKA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KTS (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and NKA (Neo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KTS leads in 3 and NKA leads in 7. KTS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NKA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NKA leads (0.06% vs −2.99%). 1 week: NKA leads (0.47% vs −7.97%). 1 month: NKA leads (1.86% vs −11.44%). 3 months: NKA leads (5.74% vs −10.22%). 6 months: NKA leads (11.83% vs −1.06%). YTD: KTS leads (30.09% vs 17.89%). 1 year: KTS leads (36.85% vs 21.08%). Size (TRY): NKA leads (133.6M vs 116.2M). Investors: KTS leads (733 vs 8). Risk: NKA leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, KTS or NKA?
Year to date KTS returned 30.09% and NKA returned 17.89%; over the last year KTS returned 36.85% and NKA returned 21.08%. Over the last month KTS returned −11.44% and NKA returned 1.86%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KTS or NKA?
As of October 23, 2026, KTS has a size of TRY 116.2M with 733 investors, while NKA has a size of TRY 133.6M with 8 investors. NKA leads in size and KTS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KTS and NKA mean?
The CMB risk score of KTS is 5 out of 7 and that of NKA is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.