Yatırımcı.AI

KRF vs RKC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KRF (Kare Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and RKC (Rota Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) side by side.

KRFRKC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KRF vs RKC Fund Comparison
MetricKRFRKCCategory median
Daily−0.29%−0.26%−0.41%
1 week−0.50%−0.54%−1.69%
1 month−1.40%−0.69%−3.34%
3 months4.05%5.10%0.00%
6 months10.80%12.36%4.10%
YTD25.15%30.03%21.58%
1 year34.20%47.68%30.90%
3 years201.79%—160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KRF vs RKC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KRF (Kare Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and RKC (Rota Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KRF leads in 3 and RKC leads in 7. KRF is a Variable Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RKC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RKC leads (−0.26% vs −0.29%). 1 week: KRF leads (−0.50% vs −0.54%). 1 month: RKC leads (−0.69% vs −1.40%). 3 months: RKC leads (5.10% vs 4.05%). 6 months: RKC leads (12.36% vs 10.80%). YTD: RKC leads (30.03% vs 25.15%). 1 year: RKC leads (47.68% vs 34.20%). Size (TRY): KRF leads (24.8M vs 24.7M). Investors: KRF leads (479 vs 166). Risk: RKC leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KRF returned 25.15% and RKC returned 30.03%; over the last year KRF returned 34.20% and RKC returned 47.68%. Over the last month KRF returned −1.40% and RKC returned −0.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, KRF has a size of TRY 24.8M with 479 investors, while RKC has a size of TRY 24.7M with 166 investors. KRF leads in size and KRF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KRF is 5 out of 7 and that of RKC is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.