DRT vs KRF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DRT (Deniz Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and KRF (Kare Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DRT | KRF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.37% | −0.29% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | −2.95% | −0.50% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −3.87% | −1.40% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | −2.24% | 4.05% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 5.68% | 10.80% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 15.26% | 25.15% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | — | 34.20% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | — | 201.79% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DRT vs KRF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DRT (Deniz Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and KRF (Kare Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, DRT leads in 1 and KRF leads in 7. DRT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRF is a Variable Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: DRT leads (0.37% vs −0.29%). 1 week: KRF leads (−0.50% vs −2.95%). 1 month: KRF leads (−1.40% vs −3.87%). 3 months: KRF leads (4.05% vs −2.24%). 6 months: KRF leads (10.80% vs 5.68%). YTD: KRF leads (25.15% vs 15.26%). Size (TRY): KRF leads (24.8M vs 23.4M). Investors: KRF leads (479 vs 427).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DRT or KRF?
Year to date DRT returned 15.26% and KRF returned 25.15%; over the last year DRT returned — and KRF returned 34.20%. Over the last month DRT returned −3.87% and KRF returned −1.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DRT or KRF?
As of October 22, 2026, DRT has a size of TRY 23.4M with 427 investors, while KRF has a size of TRY 24.8M with 479 investors. KRF leads in size and KRF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DRT and KRF mean?
The CMB risk score of DRT is 5 out of 7 and that of KRF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.