GZM vs MPP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZM (Global Md Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and MPP (Meksa Portföy Prime Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GZM | MPP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −0.60% | — | −1.90% |
| Daily | −0.02% | 0.54% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 1.29% | 1.91% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 4.17% | 2.40% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 13.89% | −1.84% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 42.08% | 13.04% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 69.78% | 13.77% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 72.32% | 15.32% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 51.93% | 120.63% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GZM vs MPP comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GZM (Global Md Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and MPP (Meksa Portföy Prime Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GZM leads in 6 and MPP leads in 4. GZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global Md Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Meksa Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MPP leads (0.54% vs −0.02%). 1 week: MPP leads (1.91% vs 1.29%). 1 month: GZM leads (4.17% vs 2.40%). 3 months: GZM leads (13.89% vs −1.84%). 6 months: GZM leads (42.08% vs 13.04%). YTD: GZM leads (69.78% vs 13.77%). 1 year: GZM leads (72.32% vs 15.32%). 3 years: MPP leads (120.63% vs 51.93%). Size (TRY): GZM leads (329.9M vs 319.9M). Investors: MPP leads (1,027 vs 683).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GZM or MPP?
Year to date GZM returned 69.78% and MPP returned 13.77%; over the last year GZM returned 72.32% and MPP returned 15.32%. Over the last month GZM returned 4.17% and MPP returned 2.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GZM or MPP?
As of September 28, 2026, GZM has a size of TRY 329.9M with 683 investors, while MPP has a size of TRY 319.9M with 1,027 investors. GZM leads in size and MPP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GZM and MPP mean?
The CMB risk score of GZM is 7 out of 7 and that of MPP is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.