Yatırımcı.AI

GZN vs MPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZN (Global Md Portföy Boğaziçi Serbest Fon) and MPP (Meksa Portföy Prime Serbest Fon) side by side.

GZNMPP
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GZN vs MPP Fund Comparison
MetricGZNMPPCategory median
Daily1.20%0.54%0.19%
1 week−1.77%1.91%0.42%
1 month−6.77%2.40%0.94%
3 months−1.01%−1.84%5.89%
6 months26.84%13.04%12.86%
YTD37.23%13.77%18.07%
1 year55.23%15.32%24.44%
3 years190.40%120.63%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GZN vs MPP comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZN (Global Md Portföy Boğaziçi Serbest Fon) and MPP (Meksa Portföy Prime Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GZN leads in 6 and MPP leads in 4. GZN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global Md Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Meksa Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZN leads (1.20% vs 0.54%). 1 week: MPP leads (1.91% vs −1.77%). 1 month: MPP leads (2.40% vs −6.77%). 3 months: GZN leads (−1.01% vs −1.84%). 6 months: GZN leads (26.84% vs 13.04%). YTD: GZN leads (37.23% vs 13.77%). 1 year: GZN leads (55.23% vs 15.32%). 3 years: GZN leads (190.40% vs 120.63%). Size (TRY): MPP leads (319.9M vs 304.9M). Investors: MPP leads (1,027 vs 810).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GZN returned 37.23% and MPP returned 13.77%; over the last year GZN returned 55.23% and MPP returned 15.32%. Over the last month GZN returned −6.77% and MPP returned 2.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GZN has a size of TRY 304.9M with 810 investors, while MPP has a size of TRY 319.9M with 1,027 investors. MPP leads in size and MPP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZN is 7 out of 7 and that of MPP is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.