KMN vs PTN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and PTN (Phillip Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KMN | PTN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.45% | 0.89% | 0.46% |
| 1 week | −2.68% | −1.21% | −1.73% |
| 1 month | −5.24% | −4.58% | −5.24% |
| 3 months | 11.34% | 9.45% | 9.38% |
| 6 months | 2.46% | 2.11% | 2.11% |
| YTD | −9.80% | 11.50% | 9.19% |
| 1 year | — | 34.61% | 31.92% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KMN vs PTN comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and PTN (Phillip Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, KMN leads in 3 and PTN leads in 5. KMN is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PTN is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PTN leads (0.89% vs 0.45%). 1 week: PTN leads (−1.21% vs −2.68%). 1 month: PTN leads (−4.58% vs −5.24%). 3 months: KMN leads (11.34% vs 9.45%). 6 months: KMN leads (2.46% vs 2.11%). YTD: PTN leads (11.50% vs −9.80%). Size (TRY): PTN leads (876.1M vs 323.7M). Investors: KMN leads (4,702 vs 706).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, KMN or PTN?
Year to date KMN returned −9.80% and PTN returned 11.50%; over the last year KMN returned — and PTN returned 34.61%. Over the last month KMN returned −5.24% and PTN returned −4.58%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KMN or PTN?
As of September 28, 2026, KMN has a size of TRY 323.7M with 4,702 investors, while PTN has a size of TRY 876.1M with 706 investors. PTN leads in size and KMN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KMN and PTN mean?
The CMB risk score of KMN is 6 out of 7 and that of PTN is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.