KMN vs MKG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and MKG (Aktif Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KMN | MKG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.45% | 0.39% | 0.46% |
| 1 week | −2.68% | −1.54% | −1.73% |
| 1 month | −5.24% | −5.29% | −5.24% |
| 3 months | 11.34% | 10.30% | 9.38% |
| 6 months | 2.46% | 3.18% | 2.11% |
| YTD | −9.80% | 9.45% | 9.19% |
| 1 year | — | 29.97% | 31.92% |
| 3 years | — | 308.42% | 198.48% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KMN vs MKG comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and MKG (Aktif Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, KMN leads in 3 and MKG leads in 5. KMN is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MKG is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KMN leads (0.45% vs 0.39%). 1 week: MKG leads (−1.54% vs −2.68%). 1 month: KMN leads (−5.24% vs −5.29%). 3 months: KMN leads (11.34% vs 10.30%). 6 months: MKG leads (3.18% vs 2.46%). YTD: MKG leads (9.45% vs −9.80%). Size (TRY): MKG leads (1.4B vs 323.7M). Investors: MKG leads (7,407 vs 4,702).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, KMN or MKG?
Year to date KMN returned −9.80% and MKG returned 9.45%; over the last year KMN returned — and MKG returned 29.97%. Over the last month KMN returned −5.24% and MKG returned −5.29%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KMN or MKG?
As of September 28, 2026, KMN has a size of TRY 323.7M with 4,702 investors, while MKG has a size of TRY 1.4B with 7,407 investors. MKG leads in size and MKG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KMN and MKG mean?
The CMB risk score of KMN is 6 out of 7 and that of MKG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.