Yatırımcı.AI

KMF vs KTJ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KMF (Azimut Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and KTJ (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Teknoloji Katılım Fonu) side by side.

KMFKTJ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

KMF vs KTJ Fund Comparison
MetricKMFKTJCategory median
Daily0.50%1.81%0.29%
1 week−1.42%4.78%0.41%
1 month−5.40%5.64%0.20%
3 months9.30%10.67%8.83%
6 months2.09%52.26%16.56%
YTD11.11%60.91%27.81%
1 year29.76%68.01%39.52%
3 years75.81%17.79%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the KMF vs KTJ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KMF (Azimut Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and KTJ (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Teknoloji Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KMF leads in 2 and KTJ leads in 8. KMF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KTJ is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KTJ leads (1.81% vs 0.50%). 1 week: KTJ leads (4.78% vs −1.42%). 1 month: KTJ leads (5.64% vs −5.40%). 3 months: KTJ leads (10.67% vs 9.30%). 6 months: KTJ leads (52.26% vs 2.09%). YTD: KTJ leads (60.91% vs 11.11%). 1 year: KTJ leads (68.01% vs 29.76%). 3 years: KMF leads (75.81% vs 17.79%). Size (TRY): KMF leads (1.6B vs 1.6B). Investors: KTJ leads (20,649 vs 2,044).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date KMF returned 11.11% and KTJ returned 60.91%; over the last year KMF returned 29.76% and KTJ returned 68.01%. Over the last month KMF returned −5.40% and KTJ returned 5.64%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KMF has a size of TRY 1.6B with 2,044 investors, while KTJ has a size of TRY 1.6B with 20,649 investors. KMF leads in size and KTJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KMF is 6 out of 7 and that of KTJ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.