Yatırımcı.AI

FFH vs KMF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFH (Qnb Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and KMF (Azimut Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.

FFHKMF
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FFH vs KMF Fund Comparison
MetricFFHKMFCategory median
Daily0.35%0.50%0.29%
1 week0.44%−1.42%0.41%
1 month1.32%−5.40%0.20%
3 months8.81%9.30%8.83%
6 months18.46%2.09%16.56%
YTD31.37%11.11%27.81%
1 year46.61%29.76%39.52%
3 years195.50%75.81%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FFH vs KMF comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FFH (Qnb Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and KMF (Azimut Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FFH leads in 9 and KMF leads in 2. FFH is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KMF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KMF leads (0.50% vs 0.35%). 1 week: FFH leads (0.44% vs −1.42%). 1 month: FFH leads (1.32% vs −5.40%). 3 months: KMF leads (9.30% vs 8.81%). 6 months: FFH leads (18.46% vs 2.09%). YTD: FFH leads (31.37% vs 11.11%). 1 year: FFH leads (46.61% vs 29.76%). 3 years: FFH leads (195.50% vs 75.81%). Size (TRY): FFH leads (1.7B vs 1.6B). Investors: FFH leads (2,123 vs 2,044). Risk: FFH leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FFH returned 31.37% and KMF returned 11.11%; over the last year FFH returned 46.61% and KMF returned 29.76%. Over the last month FFH returned 1.32% and KMF returned −5.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FFH has a size of TRY 1.7B with 2,123 investors, while KMF has a size of TRY 1.6B with 2,044 investors. FFH leads in size and FFH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FFH is 4 out of 7 and that of KMF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.