Yatırımcı.AI

GMN vs RAF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMN (Global Md Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and RAF (Rota Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) side by side.

GMNRAF
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GMN vs RAF Fund Comparison
MetricGMNRAFCategory median
Today (est.)—−1.92%−1.86%
Daily0.29%0.33%0.19%
1 week0.71%1.18%0.42%
1 month3.12%−0.31%0.94%
3 months9.92%6.88%5.89%
6 months21.13%16.03%12.86%
YTD31.85%33.02%18.07%
1 year—52.77%24.44%
3 years—120.74%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 12:34.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GMN vs RAF comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GMN (Global Md Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and RAF (Rota Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GMN leads in 5 and RAF leads in 4. GMN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global Md Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RAF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RAF leads (0.33% vs 0.29%). 1 week: RAF leads (1.18% vs 0.71%). 1 month: GMN leads (3.12% vs −0.31%). 3 months: GMN leads (9.92% vs 6.88%). 6 months: GMN leads (21.13% vs 16.03%). YTD: RAF leads (33.02% vs 31.85%). Size (TRY): RAF leads (82.7M vs 82.5M). Investors: GMN leads (27 vs 13). Risk: GMN leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GMN returned 31.85% and RAF returned 33.02%; over the last year GMN returned — and RAF returned 52.77%. Over the last month GMN returned 3.12% and RAF returned −0.31%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GMN has a size of TRY 82.5M with 27 investors, while RAF has a size of TRY 82.7M with 13 investors. RAF leads in size and GMN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GMN is 2 out of 7 and that of RAF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.