KIB vs ODG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KIB (Trive Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and ODG (One Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KIB | ODG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.74% | 0.09% | −1.35% |
| 1 week | −4.12% | 0.59% | −2.09% |
| 1 month | −11.07% | 3.20% | −4.70% |
| 3 months | −8.21% | 6.50% | −1.44% |
| 6 months | −2.22% | 17.19% | 2.69% |
| YTD | 5.48% | 21.38% | 20.04% |
| 1 year | 5.55% | — | 28.83% |
| 3 years | 134.56% | — | 156.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KIB vs ODG Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KIB (Trive Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and ODG (One Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KIB leads in 1 and ODG leads in 8. KIB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Trive Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ODG is a Variable Fund fund managed by One Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ODG leads (0.09% vs −1.74%). 1 week: ODG leads (0.59% vs −4.12%). 1 month: ODG leads (3.20% vs −11.07%). 3 months: ODG leads (6.50% vs −8.21%). 6 months: ODG leads (17.19% vs −2.22%). YTD: ODG leads (21.38% vs 5.48%). Size (TRY): ODG leads (25.3M vs 7.9M). Investors: KIB leads (918 vs 26). Risk: ODG leads (3 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, KIB or ODG?
Year to date KIB returned 5.48% and ODG returned 21.38%; over the last year KIB returned 5.55% and ODG returned —. Over the last month KIB returned −11.07% and ODG returned 3.20%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KIB or ODG?
As of October 23, 2026, KIB has a size of TRY 7.9M with 918 investors, while ODG has a size of TRY 25.3M with 26 investors. ODG leads in size and KIB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KIB and ODG mean?
The CMB risk score of KIB is 6 out of 7 and that of ODG is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.