IZS vs RDT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IZS (İstanbul Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) and RDT (Phillip Portföy Rodosto Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IZS | RDT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −1.37% | −1.70% |
| Daily | 0.06% | 0.23% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.13% | 1.00% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 5.36% | 3.93% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 20.78% | 8.00% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 28.57% | −7.12% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 18.69% | −14.79% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 18.66% | −10.92% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 146.37% | — | 111.64% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IZS vs RDT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IZS (İstanbul Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) and RDT (Phillip Portföy Rodosto Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IZS leads in 6 and RDT leads in 4. IZS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phıllıp Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RDT leads (0.23% vs 0.06%). 1 week: RDT leads (1.00% vs 0.13%). 1 month: IZS leads (5.36% vs 3.93%). 3 months: IZS leads (20.78% vs 8.00%). 6 months: IZS leads (28.57% vs −7.12%). YTD: IZS leads (18.69% vs −14.79%). 1 year: IZS leads (18.66% vs −10.92%). Size (TRY): RDT leads (75.3M vs 74M). Investors: IZS leads (76 vs 52). Risk: RDT leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IZS or RDT?
Year to date IZS returned 18.69% and RDT returned −14.79%; over the last year IZS returned 18.66% and RDT returned −10.92%. Over the last month IZS returned 5.36% and RDT returned 3.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IZS or RDT?
As of September 28, 2026, IZS has a size of TRY 74M with 76 investors, while RDT has a size of TRY 75.3M with 52 investors. RDT leads in size and IZS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IZS and RDT mean?
The CMB risk score of IZS is 7 out of 7 and that of RDT is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.