Yatırımcı.AI

FP4 vs RDT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FP4 (One Portföy Dördüncü Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) and RDT (Phillip Portföy Rodosto Serbest Fon) side by side.

FP4RDT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FP4 vs RDT Fund Comparison
MetricFP4RDTCategory median
Today (est.)−7.83%−1.24%−1.57%
Daily−1.66%0.23%0.19%
1 week−7.46%1.00%0.42%
1 month−42.05%3.93%0.94%
3 months−57.96%8.00%5.89%
6 months−58.92%−7.12%12.86%
YTD−57.48%−14.79%18.07%
1 year−53.71%−10.92%24.44%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 18:13.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FP4 vs RDT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FP4 (One Portföy Dördüncü Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) and RDT (Phillip Portföy Rodosto Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FP4 leads in 1 and RDT leads in 9. FP4 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phıllıp Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): RDT leads (−1.24% vs −7.83%). Daily: RDT leads (0.23% vs −1.66%). 1 week: RDT leads (1.00% vs −7.46%). 1 month: RDT leads (3.93% vs −42.05%). 3 months: RDT leads (8.00% vs −57.96%). 6 months: RDT leads (−7.12% vs −58.92%). YTD: RDT leads (−14.79% vs −57.48%). 1 year: RDT leads (−10.92% vs −53.71%). Size (TRY): RDT leads (75.3M vs 74.8M). Investors: FP4 leads (104 vs 52).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FP4 returned −57.48% and RDT returned −14.79%; over the last year FP4 returned −53.71% and RDT returned −10.92%. Over the last month FP4 returned −42.05% and RDT returned 3.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FP4 has a size of TRY 74.8M with 104 investors, while RDT has a size of TRY 75.3M with 52 investors. RDT leads in size and FP4 leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FP4 is 6 out of 7 and that of RDT is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.